Mats Rosenkranz vs Adhithya Ganesan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 07:14 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Ganesan

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rosenkranz 1 - 0 Ganesan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mats Rosenkranz winning 2 and Adhithya Ganesan winning 0. The last match between Mats Rosenkranz and Adhithya Ganesan was at the Champaign Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Mats Rosenkranz getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rosenkranz | 1 |
| Ganesan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Champaign Challenger(11-12-25)
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Ganesan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $4,755 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.74% (327-305) | Career Total W/L | 54.90% (56-46) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Ganesan Match Preview:
- Second Serve Success: Mats Rosenkranz has an edge with a 45.77% success rate on second serves compared to Adhithya Ganesan's 43.50% over the past six months.
- Return Game Performance: Adhithya Ganesan has performed better in return games, capturing 46.72% of opponent's second serve points, contrasted with Rosenkranz's 43.25%. Can this give Ganesan an advantage? It might in certain match situations.
- First Serve Return Stats: Ganesan also excels in first serve returns, scoring 29.66% compared to Rosenkranz's 22.63%—a noticeable advantage in this matchup.
- Handling Pressure: Both players show similar abilities under pressure; Rosenkranz saves 54.46% of breakpoints, slightly less than Ganesan's 55.13%.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Rosenkranz has won 60.24% of matches, edging out Ganesan's 57.38% win rate.
- Preferred Surface: Rosenkranz prefers grass with a 60% win rate, while Ganesan favors clay, also with a 60% win rate, and struggles on grass.
- Player Level Comparison: Rosenkranz competes primarily in Challengers/ITF events, winning 54.55%, while Ganesan plays at a slightly lower level, winning 60.78% in Futures/Satellites.
- Ranking of Opponents: Ganesan has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average, faced players ranked at 376.84, while Rosenkranz's opponents averaged a rank of 390.46.
- Deciding Set Results: In crucial, deciding sets, Rosenkranz shows resilience, winning 63% compared to Ganesan's 48% over the last 12 months.
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
Mats Rosenkranz begins this matchup with a slight advantage on second serves and a stronger overall match-win percentage recently. While Adhithya Ganesan demonstrates superior return game ability, particularly on first serve scenarios, this strength may be offset by Rosenkranz's more consistent performance under pressure and in pivotal deciding sets.
Adhithya Ganesan might struggle on any surface other than clay, and with Rosenkranz's reasonable success on grass, the playing conditions could heavily influence the outcome. Additionally, Rosenkranz's experience at higher-level events compared to Ganesan's Futures/Satellites participation suggests he could adapt better to varied competition levels.
Considering these factors together, Mats Rosenkranz emerges as the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match, primarily due to his capability in critical match situations and competitive experience.
Mats Rosenkranz vs Adhithya Ganesan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Ganesan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:53:53 | Average Match Time | 0:53:53 |
| 69% (25/36) | 1st Serve % | 57% (26/46) |
| 84% (21/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 82% (9/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 100% (5/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (26/46) | Return Points Win % | 17% (6/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 2-0 ret. | ||
SF | L | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
A. Ganesan Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
QF | L | 3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 7-5 | ||

M. Rosenkranz vs A. Ganesan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.74% (327/305) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.90% (56/46) |
| 50.62% (736/718) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.24% (128/108) |
| 50.85% (7201/6959) | Games Win/Loss | 51.91% (1168/1082) |
| 44.59% (66/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.69% (35/29) |
| 49.12% (112/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 58.09% (140/101) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.38% (11/10) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.59 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 4054 | Aces Total | 360 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 2015 | Total Double Faults | 405 |
| 1:24:31 | Average Match Time | 1:43:6 |
| 466.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 392.65 |
| 60% (22439/37328) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4416/7023) |
| 75% (16729/22439) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2906/4416) |
| 48% (7168/14889) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1261/2607) |
| 39% (1236/3190) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (323/718) |
| 37% (13970/37897) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2800/6766) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 47.37% (90/100) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 54.13% (236/200) | Futures W/L | 57.78% (52/38) |
| 52% (320/621) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (55/101) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (116/238) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (15/32) |
| 56% (111/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 85% (318/270) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (54/49) |
| 15% (318/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (54/5) |
| 18% (313/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (48/7) |